Conservapedia’s resident manchild and drooling simpleton, Ken Demyer, aka Conservative, really has his knickers in a twist. Not just content with throwing Rob Smith off Conservapedia for daring to intrude on Ken’s obsessive-compulsive habit of creating essays an 8-year-old would be ashamed of, and locking all the talk pages, so he can avoid dealing with criticism, he’s also on a mission to try and recoup his lost machismo.
You see, Ken has leapt on the fact that apparently Rob shares an IP address with one TracyS. By Conservapedia logic, this makes TracyS a sock of Rob and can therefore safely be ignored. This is a point he’s made repeatedly, including the derogatory “TracyS edits from the same IP address as RobS. No wonder why TracyS was such a loser“ which in itself, breaks several Conservapedia rules.
Now, as I tried to explain to fellow fuck-head sysop Brian Macdonald, who was too involved in his anger management issues to respond coherently, TracyS is not Rob Smith. End of story. How do I know this? Because she was sitting next to me when she logged in. There’s a very simple test for this – she should be editing from a South African DIAL-IN IP address. So unless Rob has invented a teleport device, it is a simple physical impossibility for the two to be the same.
However, both Ken and Brian Macdonald keep trotting out this pathetic lie – Brian because he lacks the mental faculties to change his pattern of thought and Ken because… well… because asking Ken to change his mind would be like asking him to use the “preview” and “minor edit” buttons – it’s just simply beyond his powers of comprehension.
However, we need to ask if just maybe there’s another reason why Ken is so hung up over Tracy – and I fancy there is. Ken’s latest post to the now hysterically misnamed “Community Portal” speaks volumes:
TracyS claimed he/she was not trying to annoy me about my talk despite using language purposely meant to annoy.
I wonder what that “language purposely meant to annoy” could be. Before we look into that, however, I must just mention Ken’s other hysterical utterance: “RobS is still an egotist and has learned nothing.” This from a man, who deems his puerile prose worthy of the main page of an encyclopaedia and who claims to have never lost a debate with an evolutionist, despite there being no evidence of him ever have debating and in fact, he appears to have run away when his challenges are met. If I didn’t know better, I’d say the Buffalo Buffoon was making it up as he went along. Sadly, Ken genuinely seems to believe his drivel.
But back to Ken’s hang-up with Tracy. I’ve mentioned in a previous post that – despite his own claims about his prowess – he is really stupid, along with being a pathetic little bully, a coward, and – as with all good CP sysops – a rampant misogynist. He is also a little man (figuratively – literally, he’s a very large man, hence all the obesity projection), with a big ego and can’t stand his pathetic points of view being torn apart. That’s why he locks them down, and that’s why he shat himself when Rob unlocked them. In what passes for Ken’s mind, if nobody’s saying anything, then it must be right. Then again, that seems to be the general conservative way. What Tracy did was just that – laid into Ken, exposing his ridiculous ideas for what they are, resulting in him performing his usual debating trick – running away like the mangy little bitch he is.
Ken posted two of his dreadful essays – “Indian Christian culture is better than low class atheist ‘culture'” and “Penn Jillette’s walrus slide vs. thin Christian lady dancers” – and Tracy raised some questions on both talk pages (saved here and here, because I have no doubts that they’ll mysteriously vanish before long – also note that they are taken from TracyS’s logged in session. I wonder how I got that?). Let’s have a look at some of them, and Ken’s moronic replies.
Tracy: Indian Christian dancers appear immune to obesity” What about Indian Hindu dancers, Indian Muslim dancers, Thai Buddhist dancers, atheist Russian ballerinas? By their very nature professional dancers are slender and follow rigorous regimes to stay in shape. Unless you’re claiming that Jillette is also a professional dancer, your analogy fails. Also, the picture you show of the Indian Dancer – she’s Hindu, not Christian. That’s misrepresentation on your part.
Ken: Apparently, your atheistic public school education causes you not to be able to read picture captions. Plus, he/she is apparently engaging in speculation as there are no indications of the woman’s religion. And last time I checked, ballet did not originate in Soviet Russia!
Now Ken’s reply is typical – avoid the questions and insult the questioner. However, Tracy wasn’t daunted.
Tracy: Conservative, if you Google the woman’s name – as you provided in the reference for the picture – you will find she is Hindu. It seems not only can I read, but I can use a search engine beginning with G. The fact remains you are using a Hindu dancer to portray a Christian dance. Ergo, you are misrepresenting facts. Of course, all you can reply with is cheap shots. Also, I never said where ballet originated, I spoke about ballet dancers in atheistic Russia. Where did I say where ballet originated? And regardless of what culture you said, perhaps you should read the title of your essay. But once again, you dodge the question. So I ask it again – what about slim Hindu, Muslim, Buddhist, atheist dancers – how do they fit your paradigm?
Ken: I see you still cannot read the caption below the pic. Next, you’ll be claiming that Western atheists are thinner than Hindus!
As you can see from Ken’s reply, it really is like dealing with a 3-year-old. He’s still avoiding the questions. Unfazed, Tracy fires a final salvo at Ken:
Tracy: Actually I can read it. It’s you who cannot comprehend it. So let me put in terms your brain can understand:
You. Article. About. Indian. Christian. Dancers.
Photo. Not. Christian. Dancer.
Not. Example. Of. Christian. Dancer.
If you still claim that you cannot grasp that you speak about Christian Indian dancers in your article, but use a picture of a Hindu dancer to illustrate your point, then you are either lying, or making use of deliberate ignorance. And the more you deny this, with silly Babelfish comments and smilies, the more you prove me right.
That message was sent on July 19th, whereupon Ken fell silent – clearly slinking off to lick his wounds.
Likewise, Tracy was slapping Ken around on the talk page of his “Penn Jillette” essay, after Ken had added the bizarre “Learn Indian culture which is more happy and genteel than low class Western atheist ‘culture'”. To this she replied
Tracy: Ah yes, Indian culture, with the caste system, Untouchables, slumdogs, honor killings, children deliberately crippled so they can beg for the family, abuse of young girls. Remind me again just which part of this culture is so “genteel” and admirable? (July 17)
Tracy: You still haven’t answered which part of Indian culture is more genteel – the caste system, Untouchables, slumdogs, honor killings, children deliberately crippled so they can beg for the family, abuse of young girls. Which is it, so I know to aspire to it. (July 18)
To this, Ken responded with the following, clearly indicating that he is incapable of conducting a debate, or being civil, or even sane for that matter.
Ken: آئےگا آئےگا، سب کا مسیح آئےگا
That’s right. The dribbling fool copy-pasted some saying from Babelfish. He doesn’t even have the manners, or brains to be able to answer in English.
Ken then made some comment about “Give me childhood obesity rates in India,” because I’m guessing he thinks skinny Indians is a sign of their godliness. Well Tracy duly obliged with a list of sources and went on to attack Ken’s other bizarre claim that “it appears as though the atheist community which has a major nerd infestation has not developed atheist dance music whereas Indian Christians have dance/music proving once again Indian Christian culture is superior. “
Tracy: This is bizarre. How much “Indian Christian” dance music is there? And how exactly does that stack up against the multitude of Hindu dance songs out there? In addition, who on Earth is writing all the songs on the Billboard 100? Indian Christians? And as for Swedish atheists not writing dance music – I give you ABBA. One of the most successful dance groups ever. Do you seriously assert that atheists have no music? I ask you again – what is playing on the radio these days?
She must have painted Ken into a corner, because he manages to splutter one final piece of insanity, before scuttling off to cower behind Brian’s shirt-tails:
Ken: Clarification: By atheist dance music I meant “atheism dance music”. Music about atheism which is dance music in terms of its classification.
By this point, faced with such rank stupidity, Tracy was ready to jab her thumbs into her eyes than carry on debating this monumental prick (again, in the figurative sense) and so she gave up – or was blocked as being a sock of me. Ah yes, here it is:
00:50, 2 August 2011 Karajou (Talk | contribs) blocked TracyS (Talk | contribs) with an expiry time of indefinite (account creation disabled) (multiple accounts; main IP from Johannesburg, SA; sock of RW troll PsyGremlin)
Now remember, the last time Tracy spoke with Ken was July 19th. It takes nearly a whole month, and 10 days after Tracy was blocked, for Ken to start crowing about how TracyS was a sock of Rob. Here’s another classic example of Ken being a dribbling moron:
TracyS, you have the same IP address as RobS! You are a sockpuppet of RobS! 知彼知己，百戰不殆；不知彼而知己，一勝一負；不知彼，不知己，每戰必殆 🙂 Conservative 03:06, 12 August 2011 (EDT)
There are no words. Well there are really – Ken, you are a coward, a liar, a moron and quite frankly, an all-round pathetic excuse for a human being. For somebody who puts so much prestige on “machismo”, yours is sadly lacking. What that says about the people who supported you, is illuminating.