Conservative Bible Project – Intellectuals killed Jesus!


(h/t to Toast for tipping me off about this. You gorgeous chick, you!)

Well, the Conservatisation of the Bible is underway. Young Andrew Sclafly started his day by “translating” six verses of Mark 3. (Here’s the tidy version) I say “translating”, because writing something in your own words isn’t translating. It might paraphrasing, or even plagiarising, but not translating… even if you are going from English to Andyspeak.

Admittedly, at first glance it doesn’t look too bad. After all, he is getting rid of all those nasty “thee’s” and “thou’s” which really have gone the way of the Dodo. (I’m always reminded of reading Taylor Calwell’s epic ‘The Earth is the Lord’s’ which has Genghis Khan spouting “thee’s” and “thou’s” and “shalt’s” all over the place, when he was more likely to say the Mongolian equivalent of “One owt treadles gone askew on’t spindle.”) However, we soon see problems. In the opening sentence, Andy has “…and noticed man with a crippled hand.” Yes, Andy’s notoriously bad writing habits are coming to the fore. Maybe we’ll have another Wicked Bible on our hands… you know, the one that says ‘Thou shalt commit adultery”… although God knows what it’ll say once Andy’s finished with it.

However, things start going wrong in verse 2. For some reason Andy sees fit to replace “Pharisees” with “Intellectuals.” Not “Elders” or maybe “Deacons” or hell even keep “Pharisees”, seeing as it’s a valid term(and is even in the Merriam Webster). I have a horrible feeling that Andy’s new “Bible” is going to pin the blame for Jesus’s death on the intellectuals, which means that when Andy takes over the world, he can kill all the clever people on a trumped up charge of deicide.

I thought I’d have a look at what a Pharisee was, so turned to the Jewish Virtual Library, which told me:

The most important of the three were the Pharisees because they are the spiritual fathers of modern Judaism. Their main distinguishing characteristic was a belief in an Oral Law that God gave to Moses at Sinai along with the Torah. The Torah or Written Law was akin to the U.S. Constitution in the sense that it set down a series of laws that were open to interpretation. The Pharisees believed that God also gave Moses the knowledge of what these laws meant and how they should be applied. This oral tradition was codified and written down roughly three centuries later in what is known as the Talmud.

The Pharisees also maintained that an afterlife existed and that God punished the wicked and rewarded the righteous in the world to come. They also believed in a messiah who would herald an era of world peace.Pharisees were in a sense blue-collar Jews who adhered to the tenets developed after the destruction of the Temple; that is, such things as individual prayer and assembly in synagogues.

Now there isn’t really much that I can read into that, that tells me they were intellectuals. They were possibly clever, and knew the Torah inside out, but I doubt they were intellectuals in the way I fear Andy means it. In fact, now that I think about it, the Pharisees were a specific faction within the Jewish community of the time, along with the Sadducees and Essenes. For Andy to suddenly replace Pharisees with Intellectuals  (are they a faction of modern day life?) shows a complete lack of understanding about the actual politics of the time (no surprise there, coming from the man who made a complete abortion of teaching world history), but also a curious insight into what he thinks about intellectuals. Then again, we already know he has a beef with professors and probably everybody else that’s smarter than him… i.e. 99.9% of the planet and most small marsupials.

You see, Andy isn’t the brightest spark out there and he does get very jealous when people have things he doesn’t (just look at how he treats Obama and scientists in general). This appears to be his way of getting back at clever people… “You killed Jesus!” Fortunately, he’s managed to surround himself with slavish minions who are, to a man (seeing as how they’ve kicked all the girls off Conservapedia) far thicker than Andy. Then again, given Andy’s quote “I’m sure we all know people of low IQs, and they don’t think and act like Forrest Gump. For starters, often they have strong religious faith” being dumb and religious is a-ok in his book… which probably explains why he wants conservative kiddies to use his encyclopaedia blog… keep ’em young, dumb and full of… er… myths? condron.us

We wait in anticipation to see how the Sermon on the Mount gets “translated” (I’m sure “blessed are the meek” will be dropped as a liberal invention) and the Good Samaritan will probably become “that gullible black baby-killer from Chicago.”

Update: By the time we get to verse 7, Andy’s ignoring geography, preferring to call the Sea of Galilee a “lake”, because the latter is a “better word.’

About PsyGremlin

PsyGremlin is a former Conservapedia sysop (although the position was earned nefariously), stand up comedian, DJ, and is currently a self-employed financial adviser, who impersonates a responsible adult at least 5 days a week. However, highlighting and poking fun at the crazies out there remains his first love. Well besides pork crackling. And custard. And cricket.
This entry was posted in Andrew Schlafly, Bible, Conservapedia, Religion and tagged , , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

19 Responses to Conservative Bible Project – Intellectuals killed Jesus!

  1. Toast says:

    1) I iz not gorgeous
    2) I stopped bein’ a chick yonks ago
    3 give ’em a link: http://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Gospel_of_Mark_(Translated)&diff=prev&oldid=695145

  2. cpmonitor says:

    lol, well ah tinkz you is 🙂
    I’m also notorious for managing to leave the important linky thingies out. Added – thanxz!

  3. Bob M says:

    So the Pharisees were intellectuals. OK… presumably he can’t use that one for Pontius Pilate so he’ll have to be a liberal, or perhaps an atheist.

    The thieves on the cross? Homosexuals?

    The disciples mmmm … Good conservative Americans? They can’t have been Jews obviously.

    Difficult this re-writing of history isn’t it?

  4. Pi says:

    Seeing as Pilate was also a Governor, maybe he could just sick a (D) after his name?

  5. martinbizarro says:

    Pontius Pilate (D-Judaea)… I can almost see the C-SPAN subtitling.

  6. cpmonitor says:

    Ah, I love it – thanks for a good laugh this Sunday.

    It will be interesting to see just how Andy does attribute various roles to the players. I’ve also just realised that he wants to replace “casting lots” with “gambled”, which is doubly silly, because casting lots is a specific form of ‘gambling’ (like saying eeny-meeny-miny-moe’, whereas with gambled they could be playing craps for all we know.
    I can’t wait for the Conservative Old Testament – how will Andy explain Lot’s daughters sleeping with him (or him giving his daughters to the men of Sodom for that matter) in Conservative terms?

  7. Toast says:

    What about his mommy getting knocked up by a “ghost” (according to her – but we all know what young grils get up to, don’t we?)

  8. Nx says:

    The difflink in the first paragraph is borken, the & is converted to &

    “i.e. 99.9% of the planet and most small marsupials.”

    I loled

    Keep up the good work.

  9. cpmonitor says:

    That’s odd – both links work for me. Re-pasted them, so hopefully ok now.
    Thank you, I try my best… the trick is trying to keep up with the stupid over there.

  10. Nx says:

    Hm, my comment makes slightly less sense the way wordpress formatted it. What I was trying to say is that the & is converted to & amp ; minus the spaces
    And it’s the second link in the first paragraph, I didn’t check the first one, thought that was not a difflink, although it’s working now

  11. Bluefish says:

    Lake is actually more accurate than sea in this case. Have you seen the Galilee on a map? If you dropped it into any other country you wouldn’t even notice it.

    Then again, Andy may not have even known that, since he certainly hasn’t bothered to learn the historical or geographic context of any other parts of his bible. Stopped clock right twice a day and all that.

    • DinsdaleP says:

      The problem with saying “lake” instead of “sea” is not that it’s technically wrong based on definitions, but that he’s arbitrarily renaming a significant terrestrial feature that’s been referred to as a “sea” for thousands of years.

      If he wants his ConservaBible to be useful, then it won’t help if people reading it find themselves unable to locate the “Lake of Galilee” or “the Dead Lake” in their atlases.

      • cpmonitor says:

        Exactly. The Sea of Galillee has been known by that name since forever (or close enough). Also, to suddenly refer to it as a lake implies there’s a lake near the sea of Galilee. And SoG might not be big (the Yanks are spoit with their Great Lakes *grin*) but it is in Israel.
        It also implies (as he’s already done with the Pharisees) that other standard and accepted names are going to change – Essenes, Saddusees, Samaritans, etc etc.

  12. thismadwickedfolly says:

    Ha ha ha! Clicked on this post as it was tagged ‘conservapedia’ like my most recent post on Conservapedia’s Feminism page. Very disturbing. Even more disturbing to see that almost 60,000 people have been finding out that the real definition of a feminist is one who shirks traditional gender activities, like baking, and who object to being addressed as “ma’am”.

    It’s faintly reassuring to find out that it seems to be the brainchild of this Andy Schafly whose ‘translation’ of the Bible seems as off centre as his conception of feminism. But only faintly.

    • cpmonitor says:

      Hey there – you’ve been added to my blogroll for your sins :). CP has very funny issues about gender roles – with Andy even setting girls and boys’ exams… because of chivalry. Ed Poor is probably the head weirdo when it comes to feminine roles… look up his “women wearing pants” over there.

      • thismadwickedfolly says:

        And you mine! 🙂

        “Women wearing pants” – oh dear. I’ve just been on a link romp from that page: from “women wearing pants” to “gender roles” to “Domestic felicity: a blog on family, marriage, womanhood and a simple life at home”. Yes, that right, conservapedia referenced this woman’s blog as a source for why all feminists want to stop women being housewives. What the!???

        P.S. Feel free to delete the extra comment below – just figured out you can’t delete comments on another’s blog!

  13. thismadwickedfolly says:

    Ha ha ha! Clicked on this post as it was tagged ‘conservapedia’ like my most recent post on Conservapedia’s Feminism page. Very disturbing. Even more disturbing to see that almost 60,000 people have been finding out that the real definition of a feminist is one who shirks traditional gender activities, like baking, and who object to being addressed as “ma’am”.

    It’s faintly reassuring to find out that it seems to be the brainchild of this Andy Schafly whose ‘translation’ of the Bible seems as off centre as his conception of feminism. But only faintly.

    http://www.thismadwickedfolly.wordpress.com

Comments are closed.